Kleider machen Leute: III

Now for the third sentence:

Denn er hatte wegen des Falliments irgendeines Seldwyler Schneidermeisters seinen Arbeitslohn mit der Arbeit zugleich verlieren und auswandern müssen.

Unpacking this sentence which is a main clause giving the background for the previous sentences:

Subject: er = ia
Reason: Falliment irgendeines Seldwyler Schneidermeisters

Verb 1: verloren = ngaro
Object 1a: seinen Arbeitslohn = tana utu
Object 1b: die Arbeit

Verb 2: auswandern müssen

So, this is actually a case of two sentences merged. I'll start with unpacking the reason clause: 'the bankruptcy of some master tailor of Seldwyla.'

bankruptcy = te pēkerapu
some tailor = tētahi kaitui
master tailor = tohunga kaitui ?

So, perhaps the phrase:

te pēkerapu o tētahi tohunga kaitui o Seldwyla

The first sentence is in the pluperfect, so kua is the verbal particle I'll use. It becomes (using hoki 'denn' after the verb to connect to the previous sentence):

Kua ngaro hoki ia i tana utu i te pēkerapu o tētahi tohunga kaitui o Seldwyla

The second sentence has the same tense and subject, but an intransitive verb accompanied by the modal verb 'müssen' [must/have to].

auswandern = heke (or better: haere i Seldwyla 'go from Seldwyla'?)
müssen = me (verbal particle)?

So:

Me haere ia i Seldwyla.

And the lot together:

Kua ngaro hoki ia i tana utu i te pēkerapu o tētahi tohunga kaitui o Seldwyla, ā, me haere ia i Seldwyla.

Any thoughts?